Make a great very first impression with your title and abstract.

Make a great very first impression with your title and abstract.

The title and abstract are incredibly essential the different parts of a manuscript because they are the elements that are first log editor views. I have already been lucky to get advice from editors and reviewers back at my submissions, and feedback from many peers at scholastic seminars, and also this is really what I’ve discovered:

  • The name should summarize the theme that is main of article and mirror your share towards the concept.
  • The abstract should really be crafted very carefully and encompass the goal and range regarding the research; the key issue to be addressed and theory; the technique utilized; the info set; key findings; restrictions; and implications for theory and training.

have professional modifying firm copy-edit (not only proofread) your manuscript, such as the primary text, listing of recommendations, tables and figures.

The key attribute of systematic writing is quality. Before publishing a manuscript for book, its extremely better to have expert modifying firm copy-edit your manuscript. A write-up presented up to a journal that is peer-reviewed be scrutinized critically by the editorial board prior to it being chosen for peer review. In accordance with a statistic provided by Elsevier, between 30 % and 50 per cent of articles submitted to Elsevier journals are rejected before they also reach the peer-review phase, plus one of this main reasons for rejection is bad language. An adequately written, modified and presented text will likely to be mistake free and understandable and certainly will project a expert image that may help make fully sure your tasks are taken seriously in the wide world of publishing. On event, the revisions that are major at the demand of the reviewer will necessitate another round of modifying.

Writers can facilitate the modifying of their manuscripts by firmly taking precautions at their end. These generally include proofreading their manuscript that is own for and wordiness (avoid unnecessary or normative explanations like “it ought to be noted here” and “the writers think) and delivering it for modifying only if its complete in all aspects and prepared for publishing. Expert editing businesses charge hefty costs, and it’s also not really economically viable to own them conduct multiple rounds of modifying on your own article. Applications such as the grammar and spelling checker in Microsoft Word or Grammarly are truly well well well worth signing up to your article, nevertheless the advantages of proper modifying are undeniable. For lots more regarding the distinction between proofreading and modifying, start to see the description in Elsevier’s WebShop.

Submit a resume cover letter using the manuscript.

Never underestimate the significance of a employment cover letter addressed to your editor or editor-in-chief associated with target log. This past year, we went to a meeting in Boston. A “meet the editors” session unveiled that numerous submissions try not to add a addressing letter, nevertheless the editors-in-chief present, whom represented renewed and ISI-indexed Elsevier journals, argued that the resume cover letter provides authors an essential chance to persuade them that their research tasks are well worth reviewing.

Consequently, the information of this employment cover letter can be well worth spending some time on. Some scholars that are inexperienced the article’s abstract within their page thinking it is enough to help make the situation for publication; it’s a practice best avoided. a great resume cover letter first describes the primary theme of this paper; 2nd, contends the novelty associated with paper; and 3rd, justifies the relevance of this manuscript into the target log. I suggest restricting the resume cover letter to half a typical page. More to the point, peers and peers who browse the article and supplied feedback prior to the manuscript’s distribution must be recognized when you look at the resume cover letter.

Address reviewer opinions cautiously.

Editors and editors-in-chief often couch the acceptance of the manuscript as at the mercy of a “revise and resubmit” based regarding the guidelines supplied by the reviewer or reviewers. These revisions may necessitate either major or small alterations in the manuscript. Inexperienced scholars should comprehend a couple of key areas of the modification procedure. First, it crucial to deal with the revisions faithfully; 2nd, is crucial to address all of the remarks received through the reviewers and prevent oversights; 3rd, the resubmission regarding the revised manuscript must take place by the due date given by the log; fourth, the modification procedure might comprise multiple rounds.

The modification procedure calls for two major papers. The first is the revised manuscript showcasing all of the alterations made following the tips received from the reviewers. The second reason is a page detailing the writers’ responses illustrating they usually have addressed all of the issues associated with reviewers and editors. Both of these papers should be drafted very carefully. The writers associated with the manuscript can agree or disagree aided by the responses of this reviewers (typically contract is motivated) and are usually not necessarily obliged to make usage of their guidelines, nevertheless they should in most situations give a well-argued reason for their strategy.


provided the number that is ever increasing of submitted for book, the entire process of planning a manuscript good enough to possess it accepted by a log can be daunting. High-impact journals accept significantly less than ten percent of this articles presented for them, even though acceptance ratio for unique dilemmas or topics that are special is generally over 40 per cent. Scholars may need to resign on their own to presenting their articles rejected then reworking them to submit them up to a various log before the manuscript is accepted.

The advice provided here is certainly not exhaustive however it’s also simple enough to make usage of. These tips need appropriate attention, preparation and careful execution; nonetheless, after this advice may help doctoral students as well as other scholars increase the probability of getting their work posted, which is key to using a effective, exciting and fulfilling career that is academic.


I would really like to thank Professor Heikki Karjaluoto, Jyvдskylд University class of company and Economics for providing feedback that is valuable this informative article.

Elsevier Connect Contributor

Aijaz A. Shaikh is a final-year candidate that is doctoral advertising during the Jyvдskylд University class of company and Economics in Finland. He received their MSc from an AACSB accredited Hanken class of Economics in Finland and it has a lot more than 15 years of professional, training, and research experience. Their main research passions consist of both qualitative and quantitative studies into the wider section of consumer behavior, mobile banking, online banking, re re payment systems, and research topics for psychology social networking. He has got posted into the Elsevier journals computer systems in Human Behavior and Telematics and Informatics as well as other refereed journals including the Journal of Financial Services advertising, the Global Journal of E-Business analysis and also the Overseas Journal of Electronic Finance.

Submit a Comment

Vaš e-naslov ne bo objavljen. * označuje zahtevana polja


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>